2012 January 4 - Editorial - Policy Sparks Lively Debate
Last Updated on Thursday, 05 January 2012 20:52 Tuesday, 03 January 2012 00:00
It’s not surprising that council’s new ride-home policy doesn’t sit well with some Oliver taxpayers.
The thought of paying the cab fare for a councillor or staff member who may be impaired by alcohol at a town-sponsored function is a little hard to swallow. But considering the legal ramifications for party hosts these days, the Town is wise to cover its butt.
The issue is actually a great topic for debate.
On one hand, the average Joe has been hammered (pardon the pun) to show responsibility by watching what they drink at social functions. Joe is always reminded to take a taxi or have a designated driver take him home. He pays for the taxi out of his own pocket; it’s not a freebee.
On the other hand, Town councillors and staff deserve to have a little fun once in a while. They work hard to represent us, and in the words of Councillor Dave Mattes (who introduced the new policy), the Town has to look after its employees.
In fact, it’s standard practice for many organizations to provide transportation home for its employees who drink alcohol at company parties. Legally, it’s the right thing to do because of liability reasons. Any company can be held liable if it provides alcohol at a party.
However, there’s the argument that employees and guests should behave responsibly at these functions. They don’t have to drink to have a good time, but if they choose to, they should pay for their own taxi ride home. Why should the taxpayer foot that bill?
To some, the new policy does not demonstrate fiscal responsibility, which some councillors campaigned on. But like Councillor Linda Larson said, the Town would rather pay a taxi fare than damages in a lawsuit.
It’s a little strange that some councillors declined to comment on the new policy after concerns were raised about it. If they felt so strongly by voting in favour of it, why not back up their beliefs?
This policy has riled a lot of people in Oliver. It has also earned praise by others for its wisdom.
In the end, we foretell that council members and Town staff won’t be relying on this policy very much, and certainly won’t be abusing it. It’s too much of a hot potato.
Latest News
-
Editorial - RCMP response times queried It’s very difficult in these economic times to succeed in business, especially for new entrepreneurs. And being victimized by thieves only adds to the struggle. That’s why we sympathize with business...
-
Local volunteers given royal treatment by IH Kaye Marie Yuckin (left) and Lilian Burgess dig into the food during a volunteer appreciation luncheon hosted by Interior Health at the Oliver Community Centre on April 18. Lyonel Doherty photo ...
-
SOSS rebuild to start soon with funding Students Sierra Hammond (left) and Kiera Heinrichs are happy with the new SOSS rebuild plans, which include a new 397-seat theatre to replace the old Frank Venables Auditorium. Lyonel Doherty photo...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4